North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
On 4 mar 2006, at 17.43, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Duh. Given I was part of the discussion of which prefixes to use in the document I should have remembered that...On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:59:18 +0100 Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[email protected]> wrote:On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was any faster. So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be, in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90% deployment.OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all Windows XP boxes....Teredo is described in RFC 4380; it's a Proposed Standard.
Still it was deployed way before that.
- kurtis -