North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: MLPPP over MPLS
For more specific discussion we can move it over to cisco-nsp but here is a general document on it. http://cco/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_guide09186a00801f26c8.html#wp1045653 Rodney On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:00:01PM -0600, Hyunseog Ryu wrote: > > Overall, MLPPP may work fine with MPLS as long as you have single > virtual circuit from each physical circuit. > Such as T1 channel from Channelized DS3... > But you have to use sub-interface (logical interface) other than > sub-channel from channeliezed circuit, > you may have some problem. > If you want to use QoS with MLPPP, some cases you may have to disable > CEF because of side effects. > > Overall, what I was recommended by Cisco source, is, if possible, to use > MLFR instead of MLPPP for MPLS integration. > > If you need more information, you can contact your local Cisco System > Engineer, and he/she will give more information to you. > > Hyun > > > Bill Stewart wrote: > > I've also heard a variety of comments about difficulties in getting > > Cisco MLPPP working in MPLS environments, mostly in the past year when > > our product development people weren't buried in more serious problems > > (:--) I've got the vague impression that it was more buggy for N>2 > > than N=2. There are a number of ways to bond NxT1 together, including > > MLFR and IMA, and we've generally used IMA for ATM and MPLS services > > and CEF for Internet. IMA has the annoyance of extra ATM overhead, > > but doesn't have problems with load-balancing or out-of-order > > delivery, and we've used it long enough to be good at dealing with its > > other problems. > > > > > > > > > >
|