North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)

  • From: David Meyer
  • Date: Thu Feb 16 13:42:42 2006 
> It's a little more basic than that. I'm no graph theory expert and reading
> such stuff gives me a headache, but I do understand that abstraction
> (summarization or aggregation) of routing information is only possible if the
> identifiers that are used for numbering network elements (the
> "addresses") are assigned in a manner that is isomporphic to
> the network topology. TLi started writing a good paper which
> described this in terms of sets and subsets; unfortunately, I
> don't think it ever saw the light of day). 


	One of the first things I ever learned from Yakov (at the
	first IETF I ever attended):

	  "Addressing can follow topology or topology can follow
	   addressing. Choose one."

	He has since pointed out that this may not be strictly
	true when considering VPN technologies.

	Dave

Attachment: pgp00015.pgp
Description: PGP signature