North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
On 15-Feb-2006, at 19:33, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
Want to dual-home to SBC and Cox? Great. You get IP space fromPersonally, if I was going to multi-home, I would far prefer that my various transit providers don't cooperate at all, and have sets of peers and/or upstream transit providers that are as different as possible from each others'. The last thing I need are operational procedures which are shared between them.
If all you want is last-mile redundancy, surely you can just attach twice to the same ISP and avoid all the routing complications completely?
I get the feeling that there's a lot of solutions-designing going on in this thread without the benefit of prior problem-stating.