North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:26:47AM -0600, Randy Bush wrote: > > > Funny that shim6 is being mentioned. The corresponding open mic session > > at 35 showed how gathering people for 20 minutes of complaining can > > effectively replace long, protracted email threads. > > and what was the effect in the ietf? zippo. Agreed. And to be honest, I missed this in my notes from 35 (and the two sets of minutes that we had). While I can't say authoratively, but I'm willing to wager that the {MPLS, IPv6, <X>} WG didn't consider this as a proposal. To that end, I'm happy to help write it up with whomever wants to for Dallas (or whenever works). More generally folks, let's solve this problem. Dave Attachment:
pgp00014.pgp
|