North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?

  • From: Patrick W. Gilmore
  • Date: Fri Jan 27 11:58:14 2006 
On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:29 AM, [email protected] wrote:


seems to me that certified validation of prefix ownership and as
path are the only real way out of these problems that does not
teach us the 42 reasons we use a *dynamic* protocol.

Wouldn't a well-operated network of IRRs used by 95% of
network operators be able to meet all three of your
requirements?
Maybe I missed something, but didn't Verio say the prefix was in their internal registry, and that's why it was accepted.

IOW: It didn't solve this problem. So I guess we're discussing the other 5%?

--
TTFN,
patrick