|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?
In message <[email protected]>, Pekka Savola writes: >On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, [email protected] wrote: >> In other words - what is the business case for deploying this proposed >> solution? I may be able to get things deployed at $WORK by arguing that >> it's The Right Thing To Do, but at most shops an ROI calculation needs >> to be attached to get movement.... > >Exactly. If $OTHER_FOLKS don't deploy it, cases like Panix may not >really be avoided. > >I think that's what folks proposing perfect -- but practically >undeployable -- security solutions are missing. > That is, of course, why I asked the question -- I'm trying to understand the actual failure modes and feasible fixes. I agree that many of the solutions proposed thus far are hard to deploy; some colleagues and I are working on variants that we think are deployable. But we need data first. --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
|