|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: T1 bonding
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matt Bazan wrote: > Can someone shed some technical light on the details of how two T1's are > bonded (typically). We've got two sets of T's at two different location > with vendor 'X' (name starts w/ an 'A') and it appears that we're really > only getting about 1 full T's worth of bandwidth and maybe 20% of the > second. > > Seems like they're bonded perhaps using destination IP? It's a vendor > managed solution and I need to get some answers faster than they're > coming in. Thanks. > > Matt > More than likely they are not bonded t1's they are just load balanced by the router which by default on Cisco is per session. Meaning pc1 to t1#1, pc2to t1#2, pc3 to t1#1. If they are truly bonded with some sort of MUX for a 3 meg port then you would not see the results you are seeing. - -- http://www.digitalrage.org/ The Information Technology News Center -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD1sXyt06NWq3hlzkRAvi4AJ0R4RVii+Wrxzs5WI5es+FYhxHD0ACgioFW /UHUMapXnmuPFSpKrXzD3JU= =MqxV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|