North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: is this like a peering war somehow?

  • From: Alexander Harrowell
  • Date: Thu Jan 19 19:10:18 2006
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UFmf991qxFIMAKdaJDTDIbSl2170a7lXKJENuluh/vH3ZJCj7MuIWlqALGu01Mz/kSA6b2tQzvu5V2rCu8RfJJJZG2d93s0bmO0N7YV0JgHK0J3sQx1LmZIw95PHrRs+oE/rmAI9vDb4SDTCEc41iECwmkFV4Gco8cPv5BwNsQA=
I refer to a previous post: Best effort is best effort, right? Ergo
setting special QOS for special people=worse QOS for notspecial
people. And who knew these content providers were getting free
bandwidth? Me, I thought they had to pay for their leased lines :-)

I'd say more, but I'll trigger swearfilters..