|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: [OCCAID] 6bone addresses going away in June
Joe Abley wrote: > > > On 6-Jan-2006, at 11:23, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > >> guess terado services will get a facelift then too? (since they >> require/use the 3ffe range for comms) > > The most recent draft for teredo only requires use of 3FFE::/16 obliquely: > > 2.6 Global Teredo IPv6 service prefix > > An IPv6 addressing prefix whose value is XXXX:XXXX:/32. > (TBD IANA; experiments use the value 3FFE:831F::/32, taken from a > range of experimental IPv6 prefixes assigned to Microsoft.) > > Draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-05 expired last October, and I can't find it > in the I-D tracker. It doesn't seem like it would be too much of a > stretch to update that section if a revision was in the works. As from: http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html 8<------------------------------------------------- 2005-05-10 draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-05.txt IANA C. Huitema Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs Bytes: 135228 ------------------------------------------------->8 aka in queue waiting for IANA to act upon it. (IANA = RFC-Editor/IANA Registration Coordination) > In real life, does anybody actually use terado? Are there a well-known > set of teredo servers and relays for which some arbitrary, large ISP > might measure traffic levels? It seems like if it was enabled it would > be possible to measure traffic from teredo's bubbles, even if nobody was > actually using it to retrieve content. Check http://www.sixxs.net/tools/aiccu/brokers/ which has a list of most /all (send mail if you know more :) public tunnel brokers and all other related items. Only AS31701 (Consulintel) and AS5511 (OpenTransit / Wanadoo France) are announcing the 3ffe:831f::/32 prefix though. But from my logs (including ipv6gate.sixxs.net ;) I don't see any traffic coming in from it... Greets, Jeroen Attachment:
signature.asc
|