|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:30:18PM -0600, Albert Meyer wrote: > I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. That channel does exist but is not NANOG-related. Some #nanog folks who do want to finally chat on-topic hang out there. Quote from one of them: "dude, this is prolly the most on topic IRC channel I was ever in". :-) Fortunately, even with currently almost 200 folks in it, there is enough self discipline to stay mostly on topic. > I looked around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. > They bind channels to organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; > this would allow the channel to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone > agree that this would be a good idea? Who cares about organizations when it comes to exchange a few words between operators? Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [email protected] -- [email protected] -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
|