North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down
- From: chip
- Date: Wed Dec 21 16:04:25 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=OW4L/FE3VfTWV+B/NFpv/V+lI0jaIXPYR5W6lJaN6px5spUHli5Sio7XDArLTkJJzhMEVZZf/DEQaJ4amC8YNL98m28aj+SMmCZx8xx1OJyiPJ0KqHRaRxY7LjSdGQdbjjdehFtgzXxE/McNZbv2M8Bd6eBNDlBDpDrVvDmkuaE=
On 12/21/05, Albert Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:
I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I looked around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bind channels to organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this would allow the channel
to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a good idea?
Andrew Kirch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > william(at)elan.net wrote: >
> >> >>I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog >>
Actually, looks like #nanog on freenode is already registered as belonging to NANOG:
/msg chanserv info #nanog
>chanserv< info #nanog
-ChanServ- Channel: #nanog
-ChanServ- Contact: Duke, last seen: 44 weeks 5 days (13h 25m 33s) ago
-ChanServ- Alternate: kerx, last seen: 18 weeks 6 days (14h 27m 0s) ago
-ChanServ- Registered: 2 years 27 weeks 2 days (5h 49m 57s) ago
-ChanServ- Topic: North American Network Operators Group
-ChanServ- Email: [email protected]
-ChanServ- Options: Secure, SecureOps
-ChanServ- Mode Lock: -s
--chip
-- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
|