North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

#nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down

  • From: Albert Meyer
  • Date: Wed Dec 21 15:31:57 2005

I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I looked
around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bind channels to
organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this would allow the channel
to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a good idea?

Andrew Kirch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
william(at)elan.net wrote:


I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog