North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet]

  • From: a.harrowell
  • Date: Fri Dec 16 03:49:56 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mimeole:message-id; b=fIH5gjcrrnOjHilcMr5kFB2T+Wi6awEoiOUHIF3+e2SSqGAImNMT9c42TA+pDu3sMWCBcIh+t1vqXdScVchsfi1/lx2UCCSFXq43D8MMT0MuMGLqrlut3PaniGQqLqRJHCZEaTufUCKePIYyhfLkU1psWORB5KMUxCiveu3RwiM=
Yes. Best effort should be something to aspire to, not "worse than carrier grade"

-----Original Message-----
From: "Sean Donelan"<[email protected]>
Sent: 16/12/2005 00:15:49
To: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
Cc: 
Subject: RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet]


On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Fergie wrote:
> I think Bill Manning hit on it a couple of days ago; Bill said
> something about the Internet being about best effort and QoS
> should be (various) levels of 'better-than-best effort' -- and
> anything less that best effort is _not_ the Internet.

[truncated by sender]