North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Two Tiered Internet

  • From: David Barak
  • Date: Tue Dec 13 22:25:21 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024;; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NWkEvMsocoOWGVGtbZDK6FujAS8wxxE3qw6LKAGgQGOGOVP3n5c3ADaRHU1P3KtNb06W4X58syGFhXjSxnZNR+ffXnGEI1AqHRu0eycy/Kw7ZEFV34ZRPCq1EkJ5T45EZoXC8rf5kN+WqV9udoP7Mac22BG2nI/wM+I20+aFKeU= ;

--- Joe McGuckin <[email protected]> wrote:

> What good is 6Mbit DSL from my ISP (say, SBC for
> example) if only a small
> portion of the net (sites that pay for non-degraded
> access) loads at a
> reasonable speed and everything else sucks?

There are two possible ways of having a tiered system
- one is to degrade competitors/those who don't pay,
and the other is to offer a premium service to those
who do pay.

Would your perception of those two scenarios be

-Fully RFC 1925 Compliant-

(speaking only for myself, btw...)

David Barak
Need Geek Rock?  Try The Franchise:

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around