North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Comments or suggestions required Internap FCP 500 vs. OER
Hello... On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 22:12 -0500, Matt Buford wrote: <snip> > > In general, I'm skeptical that it is really providing much of a performance > boost. However, it does a good job at balancing traffic levels and that is > the main value we get from the product. It was basically a "fire and > forget" system. Once installed, we were able to just forget about traffic > engineering and only touch things when adding/removing a link (or for > special situations like manually routing around bad paths). > > If you'd like technical information about how it works or the potential > scaling issues that can result let me know what you're interested in and I > can expand a bit. Can you expand a bit on how it dealt with the Level3 meltdown last month? -- Christopher McCrory "The^W One of the guys that keeps the servers running" [email protected] http://www.pricegrabber.com Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is no defense. I tried it. Only tinfoil works.
|