North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Level 3 RFO
* Daniel Roesen: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:25:23PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> Are there any configuration tweaks which can locally confine such an >> >> event? Something like the hard prefix limit for BGP, perhaps. >> > >> > JunOS: >> > set protocols ospf prefix-export-limit <n> >> > set protocols isis level <n> prefix-export-limit <n> >> >> Wouldn't an import limit be better? > > We're talking link-state protocols here... they need to have the same > view everywhere. The only thing you can limit is what you inject into > the (IGP-)global view. What a pity. There isn't an ugly workaround, either? There has to be something that can be done, given the operational risk that is involved. Certainly, this adds a new dimension to the "distributed single point of failure" concept. 8-( >> If you've got a almost-fully-meshed MPLS core, export limits won't >> really work, will they? > > I don't understand this question. What has MPLS to do with IGP route > filtering?!? It's the "almost fully-meshed" part. In such a setup, a single router which exceeds the limit can affect a large part of the the network, even if other routers do not propagate the bogus data. But as you say, if the limit you mentioned is just a local limit on redistribution to the IGP for a single router, my point is moot--if it's in the IGP, you lose because the limit does not apply to routes which are received over the IGP.
|