North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IPv6 news

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Mon Oct 24 03:05:49 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N9mFBYH1hRhkCctvW7Dxc78s4d6PFfaiS4SovXFo07RgEQOTk2xfvf8IN8lWiavSkiXEWh5FLVOGvHCMlVxhwfrzk2PK9Ee7ub7n96JcGt8ncqHHWpWlrPMCJ85OthzM+mE3r5HlVc4h9oWbboYBj7KExklJvo2za4jdIW2poTM=

On 24/10/05, Alexei Roudnev <[email protected]> wrote:
> We do not think, that _it wil be IPv6_. IPv6 is a good example of _second_
> system, and do not looks as _succesfull_ for now.
> And it is not definitely _LAST PROTOCOL_.

enter jim fleming (or those chinese guys, more recently) with ipv9