|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IPv6 news
We do not think, that _it wil be IPv6_. IPv6 is a good example of _second_ system, and do not looks as _succesfull_ for now. And it is not definitely _LAST PROTOCOL_. It _can be_ IPv6, true. But it can be other protocol (or just workaround for IPv4, as we had CIDR and CLASSLESS) instead. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Edigarov" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 3:42 AM Subject: Re: IPv6 news > > Just my 5 cents to the topic: > > Don't you all think that IPv6 would not be so neccessary for the very > long time yet, if the IPv4 allocation scheme would be done right from > the very very beginning? > If the allocation policies would be something like the ones for ASn's. > I.e. when you ask for IP space allocation you must be in the need to set > your own routing policies. > In any other cases you should use private network space with only one IP > shown outside the network. Yes, this would be a headache for some > appplications like IP telephony, > but, I don't see any problems in making the _correct_ protocols so they > could work through NAT. > > As what I see now is that a very large address blocks are allocated to > large companies, what companies do with them? Correct, they ae > installing them as IP's of workstations, when, if IPs > would be treated as a very valuable resource from the beggining, they > would have to use at max /24 (well, may be 2 or three /24) for access > routers. > > When they are proposing /48 allocation scheme for IPv6 they must be > out of their mind, because in case such allocation will be ineffect, > IPv6 address space will end shortly too. > > Again, IPv6 is creating more problems then solve. Better solution would > be to freeze IPv4 allocation, then force big IPv4 users to return the > addresses to the "public pool", and start > allocation from the white piece of paper, doing the things right. > > > -- > With best regards, > GRED-RIPE >
|