|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Scalability issues in the Internet routing system
[email protected] (Andre Oppermann) wrote: > >Apart from that, IMHO cooking down the prefixes only buys time, but does > >not solve the problem. More people will multihome, and with the current > >mechanisms and routing cloud, they have to do it by injecting prefixes. > > And this won't change in future. > > >I'm not sure whether this hasn't long become an architectural question > >and should be moved to the (new) IETF arch list. Opinions? > > > >Yours, > > Elmi. > > > >PS: Btw, anyone can give me a hint on where to discuss new ideas for > > e.g. routing schemes (and finding out whether it's an old idea)? > > With pretty high certainy one can say that it is an old idea with some > minor twist or wording change. I was thinking of something different from Susan's approach, hence my question. Cooking up stuff to save memory and processing in the router isn't it, IMHO, but I have ideas in my head which I would like to share. But then, I wouldn't want to spoil everybody's time if it's old. Elmar. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <[email protected]>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
|