|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IPv6 news
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 [email protected] wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree that the end state is 100% multihoming. I can > > certainly agree that more multihoming is coming. Many more people are > > pushing for multihoming today than in previous years, apparently telco > > instability (financial not technical) is/has driven this :) (among other > > things I'm sure) > > I agree that the end state is *NOT* 100% multihoming. It is > too complex for most people and there is no business > justification for it. But an awful lot of business customers > will be able to justify multihoming. That is part and parcel > of the "mission critical" Internet. It'd be interesting to see how many 'providers' can't qualify for a /32 and will have multihomed in v6 and will thus have more than 1 /48 assigned and thus more than 1 /64 per customer... Say someone like Covad or Rythyms or perhaps even a cable-isp? In these instances each consumer will actually be multihomed, yes? The complexity just landed on your grandmama's doorstep. -Chris
|