|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IPv6 news
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yo Michael! On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, [email protected] wrote: > Here, the suggestion is that netblocks should > be allocated to cities, not to providers. Within > a city, providers would get a subset of the city > address block to meet their local infrastructure > needs. They would interconnect with each other > a local exchange points to exchange local traffic And who is going to force the ISPs to interconnect at the city level? For competitive reasons there is no peering in my city. The nearest peering points are several hundred miles away, in different directions, and even those are not shared in common by the local ISPs. RGDS GARY - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701 [email protected] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDU9eq8KZibdeR3qURAnBfAKC4ZBCUrGq9HgW80FJxIGqfbR7mowCgi4GD ykujmYnq/FPv6MA1nKdf49A= =aUG/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|