North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IPv6 news
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:28:19AM -0700, Crist Clark wrote: ... > While I do not necessarily disagree with this point of view (as I work > for a company who uses allocated space in such a manner), others may > argue that addresses that are assigned through the Internet Assigned > Numbers Authority (that's Internet with the "I") are meant for Internet, > with an "I," use. As it says at the top of their web page, "Dedicated > to preserving the central coordinating functions of the global Internet > for the public good." Note, "global Internet." ... And what happens when a non-connected internet starts connecting to the public Internet? Even if it's through a single-layered proxy? Better to use non-conflicting IP addresses to start off with. Trying to do this with self-issued IP addresses has caused problems more than once. [Yah, "this is what RFC 1918 is for", but what if two RFC 1918 networks connect?] -- Joe Yao ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.
|