North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: IPv6 news

  • From: Church, Chuck
  • Date: Thu Oct 13 10:19:46 2005

> If that is devising some sort of NAT for the large percentage of
>customers that don't care, then that may be the direction we need to

Doesn't NAT-PT do just this?  If I'm an ISP with a million customers, if
I can use NAT-PT along with a IPV4 block of say /13, that seems like a
win.  V4-mapped and V4-Compatible V6 addresses were created for this
purpose, weren't they?