|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Public Works Peering
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 10:26 -0400, J. Oquendo wrote: > Now that I had time to marinate weird ideas even further, this is how my > previous idea `could` work for all parties. Of course those making > financial decisions would likely hate this idea since it would somehow > manage to "hurt" their business in their eyes... > > States (or countries) would create a massive public NAP which would be > peered in each state. Guaranteed not to go down. Well 99.99999% (snicker) > guaranteed not to falter. This network would be funded by taxpayer dollars > and anyone wanting to peer would pay solely enough to maintain this NAP. Marinate and weird are certainly . How is this radically different from current public NAPs, funded by their members without profit as the main driving force and what good would it do? Dragging governments to places we'd normally wouldn't want them? Please let this idea rest in pieces. Cheers, Erik -- --- Erik Haagsman Network Architect We Dare BV Tel: +31(0)10-7507008 Fax: +31(0)10-7507005 http://www.we-dare.nl
|