North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering

  • From: Douglas Dever
  • Date: Wed Oct 05 18:44:54 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eWFElcWl+zG8iFHJf81r085EfP5DztkgKx5JK3lgwnCYW4T2YcvT3sRKKHVPHHLo6Zx2xNUc8OJ0SvX0SWZuewaMwL36fVOSogO8J1oKfQRsQn4jHtT2M6W6qubxl2yqQBU0bJtqFJMOUU4uH79moBAbx23nawVTutjdI7uE/w8=
On 10/5/05, Patrick W. Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2005, at 2:47 PM, Douglas Dever wrote:
>
> > On 10/5/05, Matthew Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> They did, and I'm not down.  I see Level 3 via Sprint and GNAPs/CENT
> >> just fine.  I didn't lose any connectivity to Level 3 at all.  Bits
> >> moving down different pipes, not a big deal to me technically.   The
> >
> > So, where's the problem, exactly?
> >
> >> fact remains that Cogent is not providing the service I'm paying them
> >> for and they need to get it fixed.
> >
> > Really?  As you already pointed out, your packets are reaching their
> > destination.  So, they don't "need" to get anything "fixed."
> >
> > What utter nonsense...
> >
> > *shakes head and walks away*
>
> I think you are confused.

Having re-read this thread, you're right, I was confused.  I mis-read
what Matthew was telling me.  I interpreted this as his routes from
Cogent to L3 were now moving through Sprint as opposed to being
directly connected - as opposed to him having multiple carriers. 
Obviously, that isn't the case.  My bad.

Sorry, Matthew.

-doug