North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: [afnog] ARIN to allocate from 74/8 & 75/8
> > > i.e. is there a pingable address in each, as has been > > discussed here just a few times? > > ping is ok, but routing table entry existence seems better. ping can > fail for lots of reasons and what we're really testing is routing, not > icmp end-to-end, right? There's a difference between reachability and routability. The lack of a routing table entry indicates a different problem which implicates routing and reachability problems. I don't agree that reachability is implied with routability. > if it's useful, i'd be happy to report what percentage of my peers > have/don't have routes to these prefixes. I'd be interested. Best, -M< |