North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Katrina Network Damage Report

  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Date: Mon Sep 12 06:50:19 2005 
On 12-sep-2005, at 2:47, [email protected] wrote:


In other words: 0wning random appliances isn't all that interesting.



Amazingly enough, the *single* biggest problem in trying to get Joe

Sixpack to secure their systems is "But I don't have anything
they'd be

interested in..."



Security isn't an end in itself. For instance, I don't care enough
about people using up my paper and ink to secure my print server
against remote printing. However, I do care about my passwords,
documents and so on.




In fact, I would much rather allow access to pretty much anything
else rather than a powerful general-purpose computer.





On the other hand, if it's got enough smarts to do an IPv6 stack
and have

enough left over to have something interesting to say, it's probably

"powerful enough" for miscreants to think of creative and interesting

uses for it, even if it *is* just a toaster....



I think I didn't make my point clear. On a general purpose computer,
you can install new software to make it do whatever you want. Not so
for most appliances. (Although if they have way to upgrade their
flash or whatever that would be a way in.)