|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Katrina Network Damage Report
Suresh, It seems to me that you're assuming that your access network will be multi-gigabit in order to support millions of hosts trying to scan each of your subnets simultaneously in order to finish in time before celebrating a couple of centuries before now ? Regards, Jordi > De: Suresh Ramasubramanian <[email protected]> > Responder a: <[email protected]> > Fecha: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:32:36 +0530 > Para: Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> > CC: Alan Spicer <[email protected]>, Steve Gibbard <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > Asunto: Re: Katrina Network Damage Report > > > On 12/09/05, Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote: >> Drop me a line when your botnet finishes scanning 3FFE:0000::/16 and moves >> on to 2001:xxxx:: > > It is a v6 botnet - so a correspondingly larger number of infected > hosts, and larger botnet size > If it is your argument that scanning just won't scale on a botnet, > anything can be made to scale if you throw sufficient resources that > aren't your own - botted toasters, like i said - at it > > -- > Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])
|