North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Katrina Network Damage Report

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Sun Sep 11 22:06:20 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Yv1h6sa5NT/3hmPCIss6X7qQlEFjXV2Rv3y+L1w1wiwY48nEFndTcctu0c6kVoDNZKjMBQBha/pLu2KWAYu1kk92lo1riv3uP4opTgBgLRh+2yHkEfv+7vy3KoWwC1+e45zLaePaRqrrDK9Cu9H3xjeu6FhQ2j77/zt8529soPA=

On 12/09/05, Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Drop me a line when your botnet finishes scanning 3FFE:0000::/16 and moves
> on to 2001:xxxx::

It is a v6 botnet - so a correspondingly larger number of infected
hosts, and larger botnet size
If it is your argument that scanning just won't scale on a botnet,
anything can be made to scale if you throw sufficient resources that
aren't your own - botted toasters, like i said - at it

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])