North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Buh bye
> From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Buh bye > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:24:48 -0400 > >> I'm about to be removed, forcibly, from nanog-post. thanks for reposting. of course, i have jay procmailed > It doesn't matter what it's for, I thought there was a "no > censorship" agreement in the "new" NANOG. We can procmail. > Did I miss something? as i was not at the lost wages or seattle meetings, i can not say. but o i am sure the ml committee thinks they are acting in the best interests of nanog, process, .... o i am sure others will think otherwise. welcome to a world of funny monkeys and network operators in particular :-) o could we discuss this over on nanog-futures, where we are trying to direct meta-discussions? o by that, i do NOT at all mean to shut down discussion. in fact, the opposite. as many know, i have strong feelings on this particular issue, which i try to keep separate from my sc hat. o but we do need to leave this list clear for fergie's 20 postings a day on what's happening in austin, the url of some cartoon, what you can read in the ny times, and so forth :-)/2 o and, as you can see from the sc minutes [0], we plan to have an open sc meeting in los angeles where we hope that this and any other issues of general concern will be raised and discussed. randy --- [0] - <http://www.nanog.org/sc.minutes05.html>
|