North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Any issue with www.cisco.com

  • From: sysadmin
  • Date: Tue Sep 06 12:49:57 2005

same here

 5. ge-5-0-115.hsa1.Orlando1.Level3.net                       0%   50   50    44   41   43     50
 6. ge-6-2-0.mp1.Orlando1.Level3.net                          0%   50   50    42   41   47    114
 7. ae-0-0.bbr1.SanJose1.Level3.net                           0%   50   50   113  112  119    240
 8. ge-11-2.ipcolo1.SanJose1.Level3.net                       0%   50   50   113  112  118    280
 9. p1-0.cisco.bbnplanet.net                                  0%   50   50   114  112  122    253
10. sjce-dmzbb-gw1.cisco.com                                  0%   50   50   115  112  119    253
11. sjck-dmzdc-gw2.cisco.com                                  0%   49   50   113  112  118    245
12. www.cisco.com                                            25%   36   49   114  112  117    177


On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:35:53PM -0400, Chip Mefford wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Gerry Boudreaux wrote:
> > mtr shows the packet loss in the last hop for me:
> > 
> > 14. sjck-dmzbb-gw1.cisco.com                                             0.0%    62   66.6  75.4  64.5 293.7  37.1
> > 15. sjck-dmzdc-gw2.cisco.com                                             0.0%    62   62.5  65.4  59.2 155.4  13.1
> > 16. www.cisco.com                                                       14.8%    62   59.2  64.7  58.1  88.4   7.2
> 
> I'm seeing roughly ~25 percent packet loss, it varies.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > At 1:21 PM -0500 9/3/05, Hyunseog Ryu wrote:
> > 
> >>Last night I had a maintenance so I use www.cisco.com for testing the
> >>network connectivity.
> >>But it seems that I'm seeing about 20% packet loss from www.cisco.com.
> >>I did same test from various points including my home cable modem
> >>connection, which is not my company's network,
> >>but I'm getting same result.
> >>
> >>Are you guys seeing same thing or different result?
> >>Is there any issue with cisco.com network?
> >>
> >>
> >>Hyun
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFDHcVp0STXFHxUucwRAlK1AJ422cHoynI5L6RmM7f5Mp1WQpaNxQCfWROA
> eQNHluTG2CMNAICbeInaZjk=
> =EldM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----