North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: New N.Y. Law Targets Hidden Net LD Tolls

  • From: Jared Mauch
  • Date: Thu Aug 18 10:06:10 2005

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:42:53AM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> The CLEC can't tell you (and thus, neither can the ISP) which prefixes are a 
> 'non-toll' call to their numbeers.  And trying to get an authoritative answer
> from the ILEC about what charges are to the CLEC's prefix can be _very_ 
> difficult.

	In some cases it can be easy, once you're online (paying
high rates of course ;-) you can visit (in some cases) the telco
websites:

	(eg: input 734-764, then 214-413)

http://localcalling.sbc.com/LCA/lca_input.jsp

	The fun part is, it works for most of the states, except
that most strange/obscure/messed up one, Texas.

	There's also:

	(734-429)

http://www22.verizon.com/CallingAreas/LocalCallFinder/LocalCallFinderSAS.htm

	- Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from [email protected]
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.