North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IPv6 Address Planning

  • From: Kevin Loch
  • Date: Wed Aug 10 20:28:11 2005

Roy Badami wrote:
And on that vein perhaps it's prudent for people using network
prefixes longer than /64 to take care to ensure that the bit positions
in the IPv6 address that should correspond to the u and g bits in the
modified EUI-64 interface ID (according to RFC 3513) are both set to
Is there any known use for those bits?

- Kevin