North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IPv6 Address Planning
[email protected] (Alexander Koch) wrote: [/124] > Also I cannot help but like how it can be organised with a > brain that still works on IPv4 or so. 2^4 is 16, so ::zzx0 > up to ::zzxf and, yeah, the next linknet is then ::zzy0 to > ::zzyf, with y being just x+1. I second that. I get thoroughly confused every time, there's an xxxa coming up after a xxx9. I tend to use xx10 first, then see that it doesn't work, then remember. Currently we're using /126s on p2p, but I believe a migration would be in order, considering the small amount of addresses we are using anyway. I definitely abstain from /64s. This is wasteful. Yours, Elmi. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <[email protected]>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
|