North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: "Cisco gate" - Payload Versus Vector
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:29 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Randy Bush wrote: > > even without stiffling the heap check via crashing_already (i.e. a > > 'fix' is developed for that weakness), is the 30-60 second window > > sufficient to do serious operational damage. i.e. what could an > > attacker do with a code injection with a mean life as short as > > 15-30 seconds? > > change the passwords and write to nvram, and come back later? some more that come to mind as ssh/enable pw changes wouldn't go unnoticed for too long. change snmptrap dest change snmp r/w comstrs (most monitoring would only use r/o comstrs) change ACLs on snmp access to allow public IPs change the ip address of the host that is used for tftp boots lots of things can be done in a 1/10 of the 30-60 second window. -Jim P.
|