North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: NETGEAR in the core...
At 11:32 PM 7/30/2005, Henry Yen wrote: That's correct. It is claimed to be quite hardened. We have around one hundred of their 550 and 575 boxes deployed and they seem to work pretty well although I prefer the PIX. The SG can do much more, but the PIX does what it does better.On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:11:28AM -0400, Robert Boyle wrote: > >I'm interested in people's experiences with consumer-grade routers > >functioning in non-NAT mode; that is to say, running PPPoE to the ISP > >and routing a /29 or a /28. A sane filtering language and stateful > >firewall that can operate in non-NAT mode is a plus. > http://www.cyberguard.com/products/firewall/SG_Family/ I think linux runs inside those. Vendor-supplied, yes, but if the OP wants to avoid linux altogether... No personal experience, but could a LinkSys/WRT45g with custom linux load be even cheaper? Probably. Can a cisco 1600 run PPPoE? I've never tried it, but if they can run 12.2, they should do PPPoE. R Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211 "Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin
|