North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Fri Jul 29 03:19:14 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mfl3QUmqAX267dl/LJ6Klj96WXSbQUguRrHDoAtDscySF5HBthGhfRyjy36wc6HUNVB2CmOlprm66pBakRtEheRdY7jpDYIka/j+AmJBLhnIXhJjKKyfYpRScUtpeONY/8FYhF0z7ifJc8f0M4PIf+iadY1wTHHz2z6si8zRbkg=
On 29/07/05, Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Anyway, you should examine *why* you (or your customers) are attacked,
> and address that.  Everything else is likely cost-effective.  Of
> course, this might mean you have to do without some revenue if you
> have customers that are DoS magnets for some reason.
> 

Not allowing your users to run eggdrop or other irc bots on the shells
you give them, and generally not hosting irc stuff would definitely
help there.

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])