North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: UN panel fails to agree on how to govern Internet

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Fri Jul 15 00:26:57 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Di6npQDACiZMdWek94k/RyUxCqyLey9MX4YR1WE7Knpwp2sPJEatjC0a0A86jjcPOAoOvZIGuQCVr42W0jGDmoy6HNbfup0bIJhDUmmMJRiW0GYRx1F14qlkgnCBqTdv+sQQmv2R+URMmIgLtBUgdlSSwjKDV7vjc0O2w/RpZFQ=

On 15/07/05, da Silva, Ronald <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Creation of a new agency for spam and cybercrime issues would be a
> > good idea - this is an issue where iana / icann has no role or
> > mandate, and existing efforts (OECD, London Action Plan, civil society
> > orgs like APCAUCE, industry orgs like MAAWG) are quite fragmented.
> 
> However, many folks are very cautious about setting up such new agencies
> under the treaty ladened (and bonding) UN.

What they propose to set up is for regulators to cooperate on spam issues
And when it comes to dealing with laws and regulators they make a
quite useful worldwide forum

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])