North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Mon Jul 11 13:58:27 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tv/y5Pazp6Id7kPS7S44Y+mhaVGh8O+mTo7QH8lFnz9QHi0Bk7JFz6Xt35jgUh+EzuBGkOvZe4ySBybahXJt7Usb7fzUq2W+62WIy9zwi9TYstkLsRxD8sOGAW5uECqPd+oCT/64l6TQptoaXjIPZ27h1LDPX+lhcFAqwdz0rY8=

On 11/07/05, Todd Vierling <[email protected]> wrote:
> And this is the problem -- but then, such miserably inept admins are usually
> also responsible for the *outflow*, and are thus working for a highly
> intersecting set of ISPs that should be targeted for escalation, "collateral
> damage", "false positive" blocking in order to get them to wake up and read
> documentation for once....

I'd not be too quick to blame them considering that they are after all
supposed to be on the same side we are.  And because occam's razor is
always in mind.

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])