North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: boycotting peers (was Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming:Microsoft pushing Sender ID)
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, J.D. Falk wrote: A lot of them are still stationary. You may see lots of traffic comingOn 07/09/05, Todd Vierling <[email protected]> wrote:(I may believe in the principles here, mind you, but I'm far to small to make a point. A workable net-boycott absolutely requires that action be taken by a non-castrated 800lb gorilla.)Boycotts worked great back when spammers were stationary and users were more complacent, but spam sending techniques have evolved a lot in the past ten years. from spam proxies but these are all controlled by farms of servers and ISPs hosting these farms know what these servers are for and let it be. They are just happy they don't get reports about it any more and their hosting of such customers can be hidden and behind the scene ... -- William Leibzon Elan Networks [email protected]
|