North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:52:35AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >Multihomed end sites usually get away with receiving only default route > >or some partial routes from their upstreams. So technically you can > >BGP multihome with Cisco 1600 or even smaller easily (dunno where BGP > >support is starting to become available). > > Technically yes, practically no. At least not for the purposes people > normally want to multihome. I cannot confirm this observation from my experience supporting a number of customers with their multihoming setups that I've either designed myself or supported as part of "managed internet access" solutions. I _did_ see several badly designed setups though that had full tables (and associated hardware overkill) but didn't need it. Consequence: wasted money, worse convergence times and routers falling over because of RAM depletion and fragmentation over time. Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [email protected] -- [email protected] -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
|