North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
Dave, I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I misunderstood your point... $.02, - ferg -- Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: [re: shim6] the effort is relying on IPv6 and on the disappearance of NATs, for v6. one might consider these to be critical dependencies that are rather risky. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet [email protected] or [email protected] ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
|