North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email

  • From: Jim Popovitch
  • Date: Tue Jul 05 16:36:37 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=M3km91Y3uejFZ4AMDnJfCzRzKcuIRIW+kPDSXhrQLdOvZNbZg3MX1oRr7yMP/fUy5RJyp3YKN34kM1fUYJJVhhTUUgveOK3zeMMjDeGxelh6CUUPSq4GUfW/Zh8/Poq+d6BiTZe3QE7ELWs0TuHWtOYncCyttXsrOIFrCTJKi2E= ;
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:27 -0500, Adi Linden wrote:
> > The first one goes up and down more than it probably should.  :-)
> 
> Make your secondary mx aware of all the valid recipient addresses.

Thank you Adi, Chris, Randy, Daniel, etc. ;-)

Syncing virtual/valid users seems to be the preferred method for dealing
with this, as opposed to just dev/null'ing.  Since the two systems are
relatively compatible, I'll look into just pushing the virtualtable to
the postfix system.

Thanks all,

-Jim P.