North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: ATM
Most MPLS networks use a combination of point to point, frame and ATM facilities as the infrastructure. The phone companies use ATM just about everywhere to deliver voice across their networks. I don't see ATM/FR equipment being EOL'd anytime in the near future. James Laszko Pipeline Communications, Inc. [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher L. Morrow Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:25 AM To: Jason Frisvold Cc: Petri Helenius; Philip Lavine; nanog Subject: Re: ATM On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Jason Frisvold wrote: > > On 6/29/05, Petri Helenius <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe the small fact that ATM is fading away and building new networks > > with technology going away is going to explode your operational cost in > > a few years time. Business grade IP networks will provide you with equal > > if not better performance than a "dedicated" ATM WAN. > > And being replaced with .... ? GigE? DPT/RPR? MPLS? > > ATM is a great technology... Unfortunately, I don't think it was ever > fully utilized.. From what I understand, MPLS takes some of the good > bits and combines it with traditional routing.. But I don't see a lot > of MPLS implementations either... look to the private networks luke... Seriously, many large private ATM/Frame networks are transitioning to MPLS networks because the ATM or Frame gear is/was/will-be-shortly EOL/EOS from the vendors. The costs to run these networks don't jibe well with the alternatives. Now, start the discussion on: "private network" and "mpls vpn" and "oops, hey, that runs over the same routers as that bad-old Internet thing with the haxors and such!" :)
|