North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: ATM

  • From: Jason Frisvold
  • Date: Wed Jun 29 13:41:22 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NxxPIPTKmr5iXuOlJXLuyOJVNECEYLEI6zXNtJWjyx8fSxfXDvYPp52dbkadLfnEY5PO8W3HD9An5w4cF2HNzdo9BNh0kVmBfWfyfK6fxjqHZPEgRU7m5tAoMdzeH3R2tQR6pjCf6B84Mx5OuY7jR4W9ozUamyXHP+V1rVfNUj0=
On 6/29/05, Christopher L. Morrow <[email protected]> wrote:
> look to the private networks luke... Seriously, many large private
> ATM/Frame networks are transitioning to MPLS networks because the ATM or
> Frame gear is/was/will-be-shortly EOL/EOS from the vendors. The costs to
> run these networks don't jibe well with the alternatives.

I figured MPLS was going to be the answer..  :)  Now I must learn,
research, implement, and debug!  :)

> Now, start the discussion on: "private network" and "mpls vpn" and "oops,
> hey, that runs over the same routers as that bad-old Internet thing with
> the haxors and such!"

Heh...

> :)
> 


-- 
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[email protected]