North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: ATM

  • From: Jason Frisvold
  • Date: Wed Jun 29 13:20:32 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aUXenRMJe7RRRaSn/B/xqxlDZKU2Hq2UDKhn8IU9jLnKc3YPoQ8posVKhJds8uAA1MmjaTkunlkeM+g4nN/G8ntrUWpIFNaLoawaIhSRKXaXcEGG9ciCGm5Ao+WQc8gsHuv/lX9Ig1MdyGe+7/+gZ2c3XLnXXdBFvFntvmY+PJ8=
On 6/29/05, Petri Helenius <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe the small fact that ATM is fading away and building new networks
> with technology going away is going to explode your operational cost in
> a few years time. Business grade IP networks will provide you with equal
> if not better performance than a "dedicated" ATM WAN.

And being replaced with ....  ?  GigE?  DPT/RPR?  MPLS?

ATM is a great technology...  Unfortunately, I don't think it was ever
fully utilized..  From what I understand, MPLS takes some of the good
bits and combines it with traditional routing..  But I don't see a lot
of MPLS implementations either...
 
> Pete


-- 
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[email protected]
  • References: