North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: mobile user strawman argument

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Wed Jun 29 06:19:52 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n9U8nvHpaC4NjStWVHFcC1ko1VtAPt4n6n1ZlC06U1n75Yal16ew554xnXq0wAAc/QVWa64l7O7A4zWKfrg0yuoNVUvst03ehRvg/RoK9XJSOrtSq9DL31cgC6KHutXwsCjvNT8YdAoOxAQZFLP41+d4NLl+7g77zBO6ghX5RpU=

On 29/06/05, Mike Leber <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm seeing alot of arguments in the form of "I have mobile users and they
> aren't going to be able to send email if you use injection IP mail
> filtering approach X"  (where X is SPF, MX+, or what have you); which take
> the same form as the arguments people made against closing open relays.

So, try to authorize the sending host rather than the path (mail from
/ sender etc)

You neatly work around that problem