North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Localized mail servers, global scope

  • From: Peter Corlett
  • Date: Thu Jun 23 06:55:53 2005
  • Newsgroups: newsgate.nanog

Andrew Staples <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...] the group wants to consolidate email addresses across the
> group, i.e.. [email protected], regardless of where the mail
> account lives, yet still give local control over the email server.

Due to the potential for namespace clashes, you *must* have a single
central organisation to manage the localpart namespace. MX records can
also only route mail on a domain basis, and not by localpart. Again,
this tends to drive centralisation.

> Has anyone got any other ideas on how to skin this cat with a
> technological solution not mentioned?

I would probably be tempted to just contract the whole lot out to a
third party that is not involved in your internal politics, including
maintaining a localpart registry.

The third party can then make a commercial decision as to the best way
to design the network is an complicated geographically load-balanced
cluster, or just to waste bandwidth and take a simpler system. Unless
they've got somebody CV-polishing, KISS will probably prevail as
bandwidth is cheap.

PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger [email protected] for full key

Please contribute to the beer fund and a tidier house: