|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Feldman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:34 PM > To: Hannigan, Martin > Cc: Daniel Golding; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution > > [SNIP ] > I agree, this is an imperfect mechanism, but there was a desire > to get the process going well in advance of the next meeting. > Otherwise we would have to wait a few extra months. Also, note > that not all voters will be at any given meeting. All the broadcast mechanisms will be. [ SNIP ] > > [ dead horse ] > > > > Lastly, "6.2.1 Program Committee Membership and Selection " is > > not acceptable, IMO, for the group at large. It should be > normalized > > much like the Mailing List Admins. This disables the ability of the > > Steering Committee to lead. > > > > Ultimately, the SC is elected to represent the membership and > > carry out it's will and that should be uniformly actionable > > across the board in order for the SC to be taken seriously > > by the group and by Merit. > > I'm not sure what you mean here. It means that it doesn't make a lot of sense to handcuff the SC out of the gate on a supposition that they will do 'something bad' to the PC. Anyhow, it's a window dressing handcuffing. Looks like anyone can be removed with a 5 to 7 vote of the SC. You've all read the revised Charter, top to bottom? Kind of makes 6.2.1 ceremonial. It should be removed based on that alone. [ SNIP. It's procedural, not personal ] -M<
|